Solution by Industry
Physical security solutions designed for specific industries and real-world operating environments.
Solution by Application
Surveillance and security solutions designed for specific use cases and security challenges.
Solution by Technology
Integrated technologies powering intelligent security solutions across environments.
Video Management Platforms
On-premise and cloud-based VMS platforms for unified video management.
Network Cameras
Network cameras offering flexible options for different environments and industry needs.
Onboard Security
Onboard security designed for real-time surveillance in transit and transportation.
Network Video Recorder and Appliance
Recording appliances for secure storage and cloud-connected management.
Integration Plug-ins
Integration plug-ins that connect management software with third-party platforms and tools.
Networking
Networking products provide network connectivity & power supply for stable transmission.
Accessories
Accessories designed for various installations, integration, and operation of surveillance products.
Legacy Products
Legacy products maintained for reference and existing deployments.
Learning
Explore the latest physical security insights through cases, articles, videos, and webinars.
Download Center
Download software, firmware, datasheets, QIGs, manuals, and technical documents.
Management Tools
Support resources for warranty, service requests, cybersecurity, and customer assistance.
Design Tools
Management tools for device setup, maintenance, and compatibility verification.
Support
Planning tools to design, calculate, and deploy surveillance system projects.
VPP Ecosystem
Find the VPP Program, platforms, and resources that help you work, learn, and grow.
Technology Partners
Technology partners and programs offering VADP collaboration and exclusive A&E/C support.
Where to Buy
Find authorized distributors and resellers for our products in your country.
Sales Map
Industry Insights

As Figure 1 shows, the toolkit works as an operating loop with five stages. Detection models turn video, audio, and mmWave signals into safety and operating exceptions, and combining them widens the range of events the system can interpret while limiting unnecessary visual exposure in privacy-sensitive settings. Context and site rules then turn that exception into a decision-ready alert, which either goes to a human for verification and escalation or triggers a guard railed autonomous response. Investigation turns the outcome into metadata, root-cause findings, and rule tuning that feed back into detection. Organizations create value when these stages connect to an owned response workflow and learning closes the loop.
Bounded detection tasks are established because the event and required response can be defined in advance. For example, "no hard hat in the forklift lane" always triggers the same alert to the same supervisor, so the system's job is well-defined. Behavior or anomaly detection now runs across at least half of the camera network for 55% of respondents. The finding measures deployment coverage, giving stronger evidence of current use than a priority or intention question.
If a worker enters a forklift lane without the required protective equipment, the AI perception model identifies the condition, a site rule determines the required response, and the system alerts a named supervisor and preserves the clip. The alert should require the supervisor to acknowledge it and log the corrective action taken, so the response is recorded and not just the detection. Teams can then test detection accuracy, alert routing, and response time. The business case rests on whether the detection changes what someone does.
Operators need context to decide whether a detected event matters. A person standing beside a loading bay may be expected during midday operations, but the same activity could be flagged as a safety exception after hours. Location, time, movement, operating state, and local policy determine how the system should classify and route the event. This reduces routine activity reaching the control room and gives genuine exceptions a clearer path to action.
At Sun Outdoors Ocean City, a 300-site Maryland campground, cloud-based AI surveillance covers perimeter breaches, suspicious activity, and disruptive behavior in shared spaces such as bathhouses. Each alert can trigger a network speaker for an immediate on-site deterrent, while a searchable video record lets staff quickly confirm what happened and who was involved. Cloud-based alerting became measurable there: pairing real-time detection with immediate audio response cut vandalism by over 80%, without adding security staff.

As Figure 2 shows, interest in context-aware alerting as a relevant application is set to double over the next 12 to 24 months. Because this reflects relevance rather than actual deployment, the increase signals a shift in buyer attention toward alerts that account for site-specific conditions, not just raw detection. Teams still need to test false alarms, missed events, and escalation decisions by site, shift, and scenario.
Once an incident occurs, the task shifts to evidence retrieval. Metadata helps operators narrow footage by person, vehicle, direction, color, location, or time. Generative AI can add natural-language search and incident summaries, allowing an operator to describe an event, review a short set of matching clips, and verify the sequence before acting. The same natural-language interface is also moving upstream of the incident: operators can describe a site-specific scenario to watch for, such as someone lingering near a loading dock after hours, and the system configures that monitoring rule directly, without custom coding. Operators spend less time navigating cameras or configuring rules, and more time reviewing likely evidence or defining what the system should watch for next.
Buyers should evaluate four linked measures. Detection quality covers correct events, missed events, and false alarms. Workflow performance covers verification time, investigation time, and response time. Operational outcomes cover downtime, throughput, safety interventions, and compliance exceptions. Configuration effort covers how quickly site teams can describe, refine, or deploy a new detection rule or search query without engineering support. Faster self-service configuration shortens the path from operational knowledge to a working alert. A pilot creates credible evidence only when the baseline, event definition, alert owner, and measurement window are agreed before deployment.
Governance belongs inside this operating model. Employees need to know when monitoring is in use, what an alert means, which data is retained, and where human judgment enters the decision. Teams also need a way to challenge an incorrect result, monitor performance drift, and revise or suspend a rule that is producing poor decisions.
Start with a recurring event that is costly, observable, and linked to a clear owner. Establish the baseline, connect the alert to the existing response process, and measure whether it improves detection, verification, response, or recovery. Expand across sites only when the result is repeatable and the false-alarm burden remains manageable.
Associate Vice President at IDC
Stephanie Krishnan is responsible for shaping research across manufacturing, supply chain, and retail, with particular focus on Asia/Pacific and worldwide supply chain strategies. She covers transportation, warehousing, logistics, global trade, warehouse and inventory management, and integrated supply chain execution, alongside emerging themes such as agentic AI, physical AI, cybersecurity, and sustainability. Through market intelligence, survey-based research, and vendor assessment, she helps organizations strengthen resilience, improve orchestration across multi-enterprise networks, and identify technology priorities that drive operational and business outcomes.
Go beyond the article with in-depth research, real-world demonstrations, and hands-on experience to see how AI turns video into measurable value.